Author: Sabine Stolley

  • Commissioning and Qualification


    General Principles & Practices


    Commissioning & Qualification (C&Q) focusses on the identification on critical design elements (CDEs) in terms of critical quality attributes (CQAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs). The objective is to comply with GMP regulations to ensure the product’s safety and quality.

    The “Standard Guide for Specification, Design, and Verification of Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Systems and Equipment (ASTM E2500)” applies Good Engineering Practice (GEP) to commissioning and qualification of process facilities regarding the production of medicinal products.

    Commissioning and Qualification combines GMP system qualification principles, into design, construction, assembly, installation, testing and documentation to manufacturing systems.

    Lean GMP Validation

    Build C&Q in the process facility setup!

    Process line and process facility qualification (e.g. Sterile Fill Line Equipment) for sterile pharmaceutical manufacturing is one of the most critical assets. For aseptic manufacturing in compliance with cGMP, EU GMP Guide Annex 1, FDA guidance, and ISO 14644 principles are applicable.

    Process Validation


  • Process Equipment Qualification

    Process Line

    The pharmaceutical industry requires GMP compliance with regulatory authorities such as the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) to receive the manufacturing authorization. Equipment qualification is part of the GMP requirements and follows an elaborate qualification process.

  • Process Validation


    Process Validation Studies for Biologicals


    Process Validation

    FDA’s Definitions on Process Validation

    Establishing documented evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product, meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes.

    About Stolley Engineering

    About Bioprocessing of Biological Products

    Currently biopharmaceuticals and immunotherapies are being developed to fight against cancer, autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases and several other medical conditions. Biopharmaceuticals are proteins, mainly derived from living organisms or systems.

    The basic science behind all biopharmaceuticals is the use of recombinant DNA technology. The cell consists of cell membrane, nucleus and cytoplasm. The nucleus contains the genetic information in form of the so-called DNA. Proteins are made within the cytoplasm. So how do we get from the nucleus to the cytoplasm? The process is called the “protein biosynthesis”.

    It starts within the nucleus with the transcription of DNA into mRNA. The mRNA now serves as a template for the protein synthesis and moves to the cytoplasm. Here are the ribosomes, where the final protein is synthesized.

    Genes, containing the genetic information in form of DNA sequences code for proteins or have other regulatory cell functions. The cell activates only those genes, required to produce specific proteins.

    Nowadays, it is possible to identify the genetic sequences that control the production of these proteins. These genes are then isolated and duplicated on a large scale to produce the desired protein which is then extracted, purified and used for the production of the biopharmaceutical item, as they have come to be known.


    Summary

    • Specifications, validation parameters and the acceptance criteria represent the core element of your validation studies.
    • Specifications must be established before process validation is performed.
    • When establishing specifications, expertise from drug development, drug manufacturing and quality control should be incorporated into validation and qualification processes.



  • GMP Compliance Consulting

    GMP Compliance
    About Stolley Engineering

    Proteins can be 100 to 1000 times larger than chemically synthetized small molecules. Due to their large size and complex structure, biopharmaceutical production entails complex manufacturing processes. They are highly sensitive to modification during and after production.

    The manufacturing process can affect many parameters, including amino-acid structure, side chains, post-translational processing and tertiary and quaternary structure. Changes could have a profound effect on protein function.

    Therefore, biopharmaceuticals are different from synthetic small molecules in terms of molecular size, three-dimensional shape, and process specific impurities. The formulation of the final product is distinct in terms of excipients, bioactivity and stability.

    Inconsistencies during manufacturing can lead to inter-batch variations and inconsistency of efficacy. Regarding the manufacture of biopharmaceuticals, the control of quality, safety and efficacy especially in terms of “batch-to-batch” consistency is more complex and demanding.

    The responsibility of the regulatory authorities, as part of their review, is to inspect the manufacturing process and the manufacturer’s control strategy for these product variations.


    Establish Product Regulations

    Bioassay
    • Microbial agents
    • Tumorgenicity
    • Pyrogenicity
    GMP Compliance
    • Identity
    • Purity
    • Impurities
    • Potency
    • Quantity
    Analytical Method
    • Process Control
    • Validation Program
    • Qualification Program
    • Quality Control Tracking
    • Quality Assurance Tracking

    GMP Compliance Guidance



  • Computerized System Validation (CSV)



    9 Principles govern Data Integrity:

    ALCOA is the abbreviation for: Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, and Accurate. This term was originated by the FDA and incorporated into the guidelines.

    CSV & Data Integrity

    CSV

    Validation of computerized systems should be risk-based and throughout the entire system lifecycle. A cross-functional validation team should be formed and responsibilities such as System Owners, Qualified Persons, and Process Owners clarified.



  • Analytical Instrument Qualification

    Analytical Instrument Qualification

    Analytical instruments and devices are essential for manufacturing and quality control of biopharmaceuticals. Most of these instruments link metrological and software-controlled functions. QA is responsible for assuring that their instruments are suitably qualified.


    Analytical Instrument Qualification

    In 2008 the US Pharmacopeia (USP) implemented the general chapter <1058> on Analytical Instrument Qualification (AIQ) originated by the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS).

    This chapter was updated in 2017 to propose an integrated approach to AIQ and Computerized System Validation (CSV) together with GAMP.

    The USP <1058> has become an important document since it is the only risk-based regulatory guidance regarding analytical instrument qualification (AIQ).

    CSV

    Most analytical instruments and process equipment are combined with computerized systems and contribute significantly to datasets. Software must be categorized and specified, computerized systems must be specified and both must be validated. GMP-regulated laboratories require data to be accurate, complete, reliable and consistent.

    Summary

    Analytical instruments should be qualified, calibrated, inspected and maintained at defined intervals to ensure adequate performance.

    Qualified instruments contribute to client’s confidence that analytical instruments used for quality control perform suitably according to their intended use.

    The devise of a thorough URS is of utmost avail and influences the outcome of the qualification, as the URS is linked to the operational qualification (OQ).

    However, user requirements and system specifications are not necessarily defined equally between supplier and laboratory. Keep in mind that the instrument testing performed in the OQ aims to satisfy regulatory quality standards.



  • Bioassay Validation


    Design, Development and Validation


    Bioassay

    A bioassay is a test procedure used to determine the biological activity and to verify the mode of action of a protein or advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP), by using a biological substrate e.g. living cells, or target receptors.

    Bioassay

    Due to the complexity of biopharmaceuticals and their complex manufacturing process, bioassays are one of the most challenging parts of your quality control program. Heterogeneity is a key issue and impact the product quality in terms of batch-to-batch consistency.

    Given these circumstances the testing of the biological activity belongs to one of the most challenging analyses within your bioassay procedures in terms of batch release and for commercial distribution of drug products.

    Bioassay
    • USP <1032>: Design and Development of Biological Assays
    • USP <1033>: Biological Assay Validation
    • USP <1034>: Analysis of Biological Assays
    • USP <111> : Design and Analysis of Biological Assays
    Analytical Instrument Qualification

    Florescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and flow cytometry analysis are widely used for cell-based assays, potency or ADCC assays, to determine the biological activity and the mode of action of biological products or ATMPs.


    Implement GMP Regulations

    Hands-on Experience

    Our validation engineers, who are well-qualified, specializes in cell and molecular biology, allowing us to contribute to the design, development and validation of cell-based assays, potency assays, ADCC assays, and assays for target validation and drug screening, to support marketing authorization and GMP release of samples.

    Bioassay Validation


  • GMP Qualification Process

    Analytical Instrument Qualification

    Qualification is the verification through documented activities that an instrument, process equipment, or process facility involved in manufacturing and quality control of medicinal products is properly designed and installed and operates within predefined specifications.

    The purpose of qualifying process equipment or analytical instruments is to verify suitability for the intended use and to ensure that process equipment, devices or facilities meet their specifications and the associated acceptance criteria as defined and specified.

    Analytical Instrument Qualification

    User requirements and system specifications are devised in the User Requirements Specification (URS). The user requirements refer to the laboratory needs and the technical and operational requirements of the system.

    Specifications must solve every part of the problem described in the URS. Requirements and specifications must be testable.

    The URS is an essential regulatory GMP document which is directly linked to risk assessment and qualification. The devise of a thorough and intelligent URS is of utmost avail as the URS influences directly the outcome of the qualification process.


    Instrument Calibration

    Calibration is a test procedure to establish the relationship between the output and input variables, i.e. the measured value and the corresponding true or correct value using a reference standard to identify the deviation of a test device (e.g. test instrument, analytical instrument, system).

    Analytical Instrument Qualification

    FAT

    For complex process line or process facilities the framework is extended to include functional specifications (FS) and factory acceptance testing (FAT). FAT is performed by and at the vendor’s location. The primary objective is to ensure that the system meets the functional and operational specifications as devised in the URS. FAT may include all activities from commissioning to qualification (DQ, IQ, OQ). FAT should be incorporated into the qualification operations where possible.

    SAT

    Site acceptance testing (SAT) includes analytical instrument installation, process equipment installation and start-up which are normally undertaken in IQ and OQ. The equipment is retested when installed at the manufacturing site by the vendor. Some of the SAT activities may be satisfied and do not need to be repeated by the manufacturer. The documentation can be incorporated into the qualification process.


    GMP compliance

    The use of qualified instruments is mandatory and part of good manufacturing practices (GMP) as required by regulatory authorities such as the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA).

    The purpose of qualification and validation is to contribute to customers’ confidence that the instruments and equipment perform suitably according to their intended use.

    For GMP-related environments such as the pharmaceutical industry and treatment centers for ATMPs, qualification and validation are essential GMP requirements to confirm GMP compliance.



  • Lean GMP Validation Concept

    Lean GMP Validation

    The refinement and optimization of implementing GMP quality standards requires daily teamwork in different operation units and disciplines.

    Designing validation and qualification concepts, quality control, quality assurance, manufacturing and IT, work at its best closely together in qualification or validation teams.

    When we develop those validation strategies, we apply the Lean GMP Validation Concept. This helps us to follow refinement and reduction but keep to the regulatory expectations.

    For our clients, it saves time and money by avoiding unnecessary, time-consuming, and costly validation and qualification activities. In regular project meetings, we develop and optimize the approach on implementation of qualification and validation concepts.

    Our validation engineers are equipped with mind and reason to establish the objectives of your validation and qualification strategy.

    Why Lean GMP?

    Lean GMP validation aims to emphasize on an effective and efficient validation or qualification strategy to avoid time-consuming and costly Qualification and Validation activities.

    Analytical Instrument Qualification
    GMP compliance

    Risk Assessment

    Emphasize your qualification and validation strategy risk-based and focused on critical quality attributes (CQAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs).

    Lean Validation Strategy

    • Form interdisciplinary validation team
    • Define precisely the validation activities
    • Devise precisely an intelligent User Requirements Specification (URS)
    • Incorporate SAT and FAT into qualfication phases
    • Precisely specify risk assessment
    Instrument Qualification
    Validation Services

    Summary

    When establishing the validation strategy remain focused and use common sense to establish the validation and qualification objectives.

    Keep to the Lean Validation Strategies. This helps you to avoid costly and time-consuming retesting.

    Precisely define your validation activities. Devise an intelligent URS and risk analysis. Avoid retesting where possible. Make the documentation as lean as possible.